Re: Neumayr article

[rayilynlee <rayilynlee@xxxxxxx>]

Well I'll comment while I still can.  Rejection of embryos with serious
defects AND abortion should be decisions left to the people involved, not
right-wing religious onlookers., Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Tompkins" <philtomp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 2:48 PM
Subject: Neumayr article


> An op ed article by George Neumayr reprinted in the Seattle Post-
> Intelligencer this past Sunday
> http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/232776_focus17.html
> attempts to enlist sympathy for disabled people into the pro-life
> movement.  Mr. Neumayr bemoans the fact that "each year in America
> fewer and fewer disabled infants are born" because prenatal screening
> has provided "a eugenics designed to weed out the disabled."  I'm
> sorry to bring up the abortion debate, but this one just got to me.
> I'm sure someone would like to comment.
>
> Phil Tompkins
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn