Re: Arguments pleaseKF

[rayilynlee <rayilynlee@xxxxxxx>]

KF, I am still awaiting arguments and examples of how I have personally
verbally assaulted anyone on the List. either in personal emails or on the
List. If I have I certainly apologize, but would like to know what I said.
A far as I know Bush is not a list member, but the "most important person in
the world"  (Daily Show) Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "KF Etzold" <etzold@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: Arguments please, not whining


> Ray:
>
> I have followed the Bush bashing mail and had the same reaction. There are
> no substantive arguments on their side just vague complaints about
> censorship. One could also count the PD related posts on their side and
> they are few. Rather than their complaining, I would like to see a well
> reasoned description of what Bush is doing. And I don't mean a rehash of
> what they are saying. Example: Somebody said we are fighting terrorists in
> Iraq. That may be true today, but it certainly was not the premise on
> which
> this preemptive war was started. There were no terrorists there then.
> Saddam would not stand for the competition. Iraq has become a fertile
> ground for them. Indeed Iraq as a single country may well cease to exist.
>
> K. F.
>
>
>
>             rayilynlee
>             <rayilynlee@xxxxx
>             ET>                                                        To
>             Sent by:                  PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>             "Parkinson's                                               cc
>             Information
>             Exchange Network"                                     Subject
>             <PARKINSN@listser         Arguments please, not whining
>             v.utoronto.ca>
>
>
>             09/25/2005 02:56
>             PM
>
>
>             Please respond to
>               "Parkinson's
>                Information
>             Exchange Network"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Teresa,
>
> I would like an example of how I have displayed hatred for anyone on this
> list.  Let's hear some ARGUMENTS from you about why a cell is a person,
> why
> a preemptive war is OK.  I would love to debate these issues with anyone
> instead of your just claiming I am hateful.
>
> I have been through the fire in life and the classroom and am not afraid
> of
> you.  I am not going away.   Your problem with me is that you don't  seem
> to
> have any arguments.
>
> Just saw a great movie, "Warm Springs" about FDR (who as a Republican I
> used
> to oppose) and how he dealt with polio.  When I cried several times, my
> dog
> did too.   We never saw FDR's greatest battle, I highly recommend it.
> Ray
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Theresa Rehtom" <Ladyt231@xxxxxxx>
> To: <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 4:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Bush bashing
>
>
> > There is no tolerance here for anyone who disagrees with Ray.  That is
> > what
> > appears to be the problem.  There are no values tolerated in  discussion
> > unless they align with Ray's.
> >
> > Yes there is an occasional posting allowed that disagrees but if the
> > poster
> > begins to make statements counter to Ray's beliefs they are soon attacked
> > by
> > the  same group of Bush bashers under the guise of "freedom of speech"
> and
> > "we
> > are just searching for a cure"
> >
> > No Rick there is no tolerance displayed here only hatred.  The
> suggestion
> > of
> > filtering does not really work.  Why should a person join a  list hoping
> > for
> > Parkinsons information and support and then have to filter out  hatred
> and
> > blatantly political rantings.  Why should a person have to  turn on
> > filters to
> > feel welcome.
> >
> > Yes these rantings make her feel good.  I'm glad for that.  I am  unhappy
> > that she has driven so many people away from this list.  Fine  caring
> > people were
> > driven away and even Doctors who were supportive of all and  provided
> > balance
> > when medical advice was flowing.
> >
> > I guess we don't need the rejects doctors anyway.  There is rarely any
> > Parkinson's related discussions going on here.  There are only the bones
> > of  a once
> > useful list.  They only support a few bits of dying flesh now.   What a
> > shame.  It takes a whole body to be useful and function.  All  the
> organs.
> > All the
> > muscle.  Not just the bones.  Just like  Parkinson's limits the
> usefulness
> > of
> > the body by killing parts off the  brain.  This list has killed off and
> > rejected valuable  contributors...  The only thing left are the feeble
> > shakes,
> > weakness,  delusions, drooling, paranoia and the inability provide
> support
> > for
> > others.
> >
> > RIP one time useful list...
> >
> > Just my observations.  Please feel free to disagree.  I won't  hold it
> > against you or decree that your opinions are not  worthy posting.  They
> > are all
> > worthy.  It is just a shame what  has happened to this list.
> >
> > With Love and Respect for all
> >
> > Theresa
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> > mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn